“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”
Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.
The SIQ for this article will be revealed
once 2 ratings are submitted.
Published via the DMIMS School of Epidemiology and Public Health Channel.
periodontitis, gingival inflammation, dental plaque, herbal mouthwash, non-herbal mouthwash
Samiksha Tidke, Gaurav Kumar Chhabra, Priyanka P. Madhu , Amit Reche, Saee Wazurkar, Shriya R. Singi
Published: August 13, 2022 (see history)
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27956
Cite this article as: Tidke S, Chhabra G, Madhu P P, et al. (August 13, 2022) The Effectiveness of Herbal Versus Non-Herbal Mouthwash for Periodontal Health: A Literature Review. Cureus 14(8): e27956. doi:10.7759/cureus.27956
Dental plaque is a biofilm of microorganisms that present naturally on the exposed tooth surface; it is the main etiological factor for many periodontal conditions and other oral health issues and its regular removal from the oral cavity can prevent many periodontal problems. Despite several experiments using herbal oral care products to reduce dental plaque or gingivitis, the findings remain inconclusive. We performed a systematic literature search on PubMed and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) dating from 2001 up to and including the year 2021. The keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms comprised combinations of the following: herbal, clove oil, peppermint oil, ginger, basil, ajwain, betel leaf extract, neem, lavender, non-herbal, chlorhexidine, fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, stannous fluoride, and mouthwashes. Each of the titles that the search elicited was screened and duplicates were removed from the gathered results. The full-text versions of the remaining articles were downloaded and examined by title and abstract. Handsearching was not carried out. We initially identified 21 studies; 14 studies, which did not fulfill the selection criteria, were excluded. All the included studies reported a reduction in plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) scores in both herbal and non-herbal groups. Two studies reported the superiority of the non-herbal mouthwash over the herbal one while five of the studies showed no significant difference in PI and GI scores between herbal and non-herbal mouthwash, implying equal efficacy of both, i.e., Triphala, aloe vera, tea tree, and polyherbal groups like Zingiber officinale, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Calendula officinalis, and chlorhexidine. Current research suggests that herbal mouthwashes are as effective as non-herbal mouthwashes for reducing dental plaque in the short term; however, the evidence is based on low-quality trials.
Dental plaque is a biofilm of microorganisms that present naturally on the exposed tooth surface. It causes many periodontal conditions and other oral health issues and its regular removal from the oral cavity can prevent many periodontal problems. Plaque control normally involves preventive measures aimed at removing dental plaque and preventing it from recurring [1]. This can be accomplished either mechanically or chemically, and sometimes these two procedures are combined. With regular brushing, plaque can be removed from the tooth surface mechanically. Though toothpaste plays a very small role in its removal, the removal of bacterial plaque biofilm prevents gingivitis, periodontitis, and dental caries. To generate this inhibitory effect on plaque formation, a variety of compounds, primarily antimicrobial agents, have been added to dentifrices. Agents like chlorhexidine and triclosan have been shown to be effective [2-3]. Chlorhexidine is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial biguanide that has the strongest anti-plaque properties [4]. However, it is not recommended for long-term daily usage because it has been linked to a number of local side effects, which include brownish staining of the teeth, restorative materials, and the dorsum of the tongue [5]. In addition to interference with taste, periodontitis and dental caries prevention have traditionally relied on controlling biofilm formation on teeth [6]. Chemical plaque control using mouthwash is an adjuvant therapy that helps to remove plaque and prevent the build-up of microbiological plaque, potentially reducing the need for mechanical oral hygiene [7]. The use of “herbal” medicine has sparked interest and resulted in the emergence of complementary and alternative therapies in healthcare promotion in many regions of the world due to the increased awareness of indigenous medical traditions. Herbal compounds have been used in oral care products for some time, most commonly in South Asian nations, to help individuals with gingivitis improve their oral hygiene [2,8]. However, despite a vast number of experiments using various types of herbal mouthwash to reduce dental plaque or gingivitis, the findings remain inconclusive.
Search Strategy
A literature search was performed on PubMed and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) dating from 2001 up to and including the year 2021. The keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms comprised combinations of the following: herbal, clove oil, peppermint oil, ginger, basil, ajwain, betel leaf extract, neem, lavender, non-herbal, chlorhexidine, fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, stannous fluoride, and mouthwashes. Each of the titles that the search elicited was screened and duplicates were eliminated from the gathered results. The full-text versions of the remaining articles were downloaded and examined by title and abstract. Handsearching was not carried out.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: studies including patients without any systemic disease, both male and female patients, intervention: studies that included herbal mouthwashes, comparison: studies that included non-herbal mouthwashes, only RCTs, articles published from 2001 to 2021 (till July) in the English language, and articles from PubMed and Cochrane databases. The outcome measures were a reduction in the level of dental plaque and gingival inflammation. The outcomes were assessed on the following basis for both control and intervention arms: firstly, the mean reduction in plaque index (PI) based on Silness-Löe plaque index or modified Quigley-Hein or Turesky-Gilmore-Glickman modification of Quigley-Hein plaque index; secondly, the mean reduction of the gingival inflammation by Silness-Löe gingival index and, lastly, short term effects (studies up to one month).
The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients above the age of 50 and below the age of seven years, patients who underwent any oral prophylactic procedure before and within the study duration, articles published before 2001, articles in languages other than English, articles other than RCTs, patients on antimicrobial therapy during the procedure or 15 days prior to the treatment.
The aim of this literature review is to investigate and compare the effectiveness of herbal mouthwashes with non-herbal mouthwashes in controlling plaque and gingivitis.
Table 1 provides a summary of the included studies.
MQH: modified Quigley-Hein index; PI: plaque index; GI: gingival index; OHI: oral hygiene index; GBI: gingival bleeding index; MGI: modified gingival index; TRP: Triphala
The study methodology is illustrated in Figure 1.
*[16]
Plaque is the main etiological factor leading to gingivitis and periodontitis. Daily plaque removal is important for gingival health. With regular brushing, plaque can be removed from the tooth surface mechanically. However, toothpaste plays a very small role in its removal. Removal of microbial dental plaque biofilm is a must as it prevents gingivitis, periodontitis, and dental caries, and for this purpose, a variety of compounds, primarily antimicrobial agents, have been added to dentifrices and mouthwashes. Our search strategy initially yielded 21 articles; the scrutiny of titles and abstracts reduced the number of articles to 14. Studies that did not meet the selection criteria were excluded. Seven RCTs were included in the review, which comprised 626 patients, based on the inclusion criteria. A summary of included studies is shown in Table 1.
An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. When published data was missing, incomplete, or inconsistent with RCT protocols, we contacted the authors/manufacturers for more information. If studies did not have outcome measures of interest, did not specify randomization or intention-to-treat analysis, or had missing data, we contacted authors through email. Clinical heterogeneity was seen in the herbal ingredients present in mouthwash in RCTs. All the studies showed a significant reduction in both herbal and non-herbal groups, but the difference in PI and GI scores between the herbal and non-herbal groups was insignificant. Two of the studies (those by Southern et al. and Nayak et al.) showed that the herbal group did not yield a statically significant decrease in PI and GI scores compared to the non-herbal group, indicating the superiority of the non-herbal group. Herbal ingredients like Triphala, aloe vera, tea tree, and polyherbal groups like Zingiber officinale, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Calendula officinalis were found to be equally effective than non-herbal counterparts. Data were insufficient to ascertain as to which mouthwash is more potent in reducing plaque and gingivitis although both groups were found to be equally effective and the difference in the values was insignificant.
It was observed that despite brushing twice daily, which removes the main etiological factor leading to gingivitis and periodontitis, these diseases are common in a majority of people [17]. Maintaining an acceptable degree of plaque control using traditional mechanical methods and dentifrices is certainly difficult, but it is now the only feasible means of improving periodontal health on a mass level from a therapeutic standpoint [1]. The majority of the plaque is mechanically removed; however, there is still thin dental plaque that can be easily removed chemically. Hence, the current study recommends a combination of chemical and mechanical oral hygiene treatments for the most effective plaque removal [17]. When compared to other potential antiplaque agents, chlorhexidine has been shown to have the highest success rate and is thus recognized as a gold standard for plaque removal. But because of its local side effects, such as extrinsic stains and taste irregularities, chlorhexidine’s long-term use has been limited. The use of CPC-containing mouth-rinse as an adjuvant to toothbrushing has been demonstrated to be successful in reducing dental plaque and gingival irritation over the long and short term. Because Ayurvedic medicinal plants have no or minimum negative effects, they are employed in a variety of treatments.
As part of the search for a suitable adjuvant to mechanical therapy for long-term usage, some herbal mouthwash and herbal extracts have been evaluated both in vitro and in vivo [18]. It has been seen that aloe vera is a potent antimicrobial agent and can be used for plaque removal. It can act as a good herbal substitute as it overcomes side effects such as immediate hypersensitivity, toxicity, and tooth staining. In a study by Kamath et al. [11], aloe vera mouthwash was compared with chlorhexidine mouthwash, and it was found to be equally effective as chlorhexidine. The study conducted by Bhat et al. demonstrated the plaque-preventing potential of herbal mouthwashes, which include ingredients like S. persica, P. betle, T. Billerica, and E. cardamomum. S. persica, a toothbrush tree locally called “Miswak”, has been proven to be an efficient antiplaque agent in numerous studies [9]. When compared to chlorhexidine mouthwash, herbal mouthwash was found to be just as effective at reducing plaque and gingivitis [9]. In a study conducted by Pradeep et al., TRP mouthwash was found to reduce inflammatory markers, resulting in gingivitis improvement [10]. The findings were comparable to those related to CHX mouthwash, which has long been considered the “gold standard” in the treatment of gingivitis and periodontitis. Hence, TRP mouthwash may be regarded as a possible therapeutic agent in the treatment of gingivitis. Triphala mouthwash appears to have the same clinical efficacy as CHX-MW in improving plaque-induced gingivitis. TRP is a cost-effective option that is readily available and has minimal side effects on periodontal tissues [19]. Mahyari et al. found satisfactory changes in gingival and plaque scores from baseline to day 14; however, the scores remained statistically unchanged in the placebo group [14]. Polyherbal mouthwash was found to be safe and effective in reducing plaque and gingivitis. In the study performed by Southern et.al., it was found that chlorhexidine was the only rinse to demonstrate a statistically significant effect in the reduction of mean GI and PI scores. Chlorhexidine was more effective in reducing plaque and gingival scores when compared to herbal and placebo [13]. A study performed by Jalaluddin et al. stated that in both herbal and chlorhexidine groups, there was a reduction in PI and GI scores, but a significant difference was only seen in baseline scores [15].
Extensive research has been conducted to determine the effects of chlorhexidine and herbal mouthwashes individually, but there is very limited data comparing their efficacy both clinically and experimentally. Herbal toothpaste seems to be as effective as non-herbal toothpaste, but it does not surpass the effectiveness of fluoride toothpaste. Some of these substances can lead to undesirable side effects such as tooth staining and altered taste. As a result, natural components in herbal dentifrices have received more attention. Ayurvedic medicine takes a holistic approach to treating humankind. It can maintain a balance between general and oral health, as well as the environment, which is critical for human well-being in today’s world. Consequently, plaque control should include both chemical and mechanical methods.
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
Epidemiology and Public Health, National Institute of Medical Sciences Dental College and Hospital, Jaipur, IND
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
10.7759/cureus.27956
Tidke S, Chhabra G, Madhu P P, et al. (August 13, 2022) The Effectiveness of Herbal Versus Non-Herbal Mouthwash for Periodontal Health: A Literature Review. Cureus 14(8): e27956. doi:10.7759/cureus.27956
Received by Cureus: June 28, 2022
Peer review began: July 23, 2022
Peer review concluded: August 02, 2022
Published: August 13, 2022
© Copyright 2022
Tidke et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
*[16]
MQH: modified Quigley-Hein index; PI: plaque index; GI: gingival index; OHI: oral hygiene index; GBI: gingival bleeding index; MGI: modified gingival index; TRP: Triphala
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.
This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.
Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
Already have an account? Sign in.
Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.
By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
